Stand up Europe: Bitcoin is threatened by MiCA
%20--%3e%3csvg%20version='1.1'%20id='Layer_1'%20xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg'%20xmlns:xlink='http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink'%20x='0px'%20y='0px'%20viewBox='0%200%20295.5%20295.5'%20style='enable-background:new%200%200%20295.5%20295.5;'%20xml:space='preserve'%3e%3cstyle%20type='text/css'%3e%20.st0{fill:%23231F20;}%20%3c/style%3e%3ctitle%3eclock%20icon%3c/title%3e%3cpath%20class='st0'%20d='M268.8,147.7c0,66.9-54.2,121.1-121.1,121.1c-66.9,0-121.1-54.2-121.1-121.1S80.9,26.6,147.8,26.6V0%20C66.1,0,0,66.1,0,147.8s66.1,147.8,147.8,147.8s147.8-66.1,147.8-147.8c0,0,0,0,0,0H268.8z'/%3e%3cpolygon%20class='st0'%20points='134.4,80.6%20134.4,134.4%20134.4,147.8%20134.4,161.1%20187.8,161.1%20187.8,134.4%20161.1,134.4%20161.1,80.6%20'/%3e%3c/svg%3e)
2 min read
On Monday, March 14th, the European Parliament ECON Committee will vote on the MiCA, the regulation that will define the course of cryptocurrency adoption in the EU. The regulation will be applicable on all the EU member states. This will harmonize the cryptocurrency laws, allowing for companies to access cross border Europe.
So, this regulation is very important.
MICA IS NOT TECH NEUTRAL
The current draft of MiCA will create a significant barrier for Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus as compared to Proof-of Stake (PoS) or other consensus mechanism. Bitcoin relies on PoW consensus, and therefore will be in a significant disadvantageous position if the current draft of MiCA gets approved.
Developers and organizations should be free to choose the technology they deem fit, subject to relevant intellectual property laws. Policy makers around the globe aim to create technology regulations with the principle of neutrality. Favoring one technology over the other can have devasting effect on the market competition and will ultimately harm the end users. So, it’s never wise for any policy makers to favour one technology over the other.
However, the EU policymakers are trying to break from such core principle. Mandating only PoW consensus enabled blockchains to fulfil minimum environmental suitability standard will be detrimental. It seems there are two alternatives that will be voted tomorrow, one imposing such environmental obligation on PoW and other not, as proposed by Dr. Stephan Berger.
REACH OUT TO YOUR MEP
The current differential treatment towards PoW is purely guided by the fear and irrationality. Bitcoin is by far the most decentralized crypto asset in the market and as an industry player we all the having obligation to speak out against such unjust treatment towards PoW.
Being a Luxembourg entity and having operations in the European market, we at STOKR are determined to highlight the hypocrisy and unjust discrimination, policy makers are putting on the PoW enabled blockchain. That is why we are calling on YOU to contact your Member of European Parliament (MEP) and let them know that you oppose a Bitcoin ban in Europe and any unjust, discriminatory obligations on the PoW.
Michael Roerade was kind enough to compile a list of all Committee members with email addresses and Twitter handles for easy copy/pasting, sorted by country. Feel free to use this and reach out to your respective MEP(s).
Stand up Europe! It is for the FUTURE.
Arnab Naskar
Discover related insights
BITCOIN MINING; A SERIES - PART 2: HASHRATE
Bitcoin price determines hashrate, or is it the other way around? In this entry, we dive into hashrates.
Bitcoin Mining; A Series - Part 1: The Ups, Downs and Rebounds
Wie die ARD Falschinformationen über Bitcoin verbreitet
Disclaimer: This website is operated by STOKR S.A., a Luxembourg public limited liability company (société anonyme), having its registered office at 9, Rue du Laboratoire, L-1911 Luxembourg and registered with the Luxembourg trade and companies register (Registre de commerce et des sociétés, Luxembourg) under number B226662, authorised as a crypto asset service provider (CASP) and as a payment institution (PI) and registered with the CSSF. STOKR S.A. is a technology and platform service provider. It does not issue, offer, place, market or promote financial instruments, does not provide investment advice, and does not act as an intermediary between investors and issuers. Instruments presented on this website are offered by third-party issuers on their own behalf and on their own responsibility. Other entities named on this website, including issuers and their management companies, are separate legal entities; they are not part of STOKR S.A.'s authorisations and may be subject to a different regulatory framework, or to none.